Gotham – The Pilot Episode

The pilot episode (titled only \”Pilot\”) of Gotham premiered on UK television (Channel 5) last Monday, 13th October at 9pm. It\’s been getting some good reviews on the internet, and I was really looking forward to seeing the first episode. So what did I think of it?

Overall, not bad. Not bad at all. I\’d give it a 7/10. I liked it enough that I\’m really looking forward to the second episode tonight. The series is developed and written by Bruno Heller, the same guy behind hit series The Mentalist and Rome, so it certainly has some good pedigree behind it. I like Heller\’s other shows, so this bodes well for Gotham, and it is definitely in good hands.

The interesting thing about Gotham is that it is set in the Batman Universe, but it\’s not actually about Batman, although it does focus on the events, characters and background that lead up to the later Batman Universe which we\’re all familiar with. You\’d expect to see heroes and villains from the comic books and earlier television series and films, but Gotham is actually a (fairly) straightforward cop/crime series (at least so far), with no Batman or other comic book fantasy characters in sight. But we do see signs of things to come, with much younger versions of characters who will later become the hero and villains that we recognize from the familiar Batman Universe – the young pre-Batman Bruce Wayne and his butler, Alfred Pennyworth, Oswald Cobblepot/the Penguin, Edward Nygma/the Riddler, Harvey Dent/Two-Face, Selina Kyle/Catwoman and Ivy Pepper/Poison Ivy.

The Pilot episode opens up with the murder of Bruce Wayne\’s parents, Thomas and Martha, and the attempts of central characters Detectives James Gordon and Harvey Bullock to track down the killer. We also meet many of the individuals who would\’ve featured more as background characters in other tellings of the beginning of the Bruce Wayne/Batman story. As such, I was pleased to see many of the everyday/non fantasy characters from the pre-Batman Gotham universe taking centre stage and becoming the primary focus of the series. To be honest, I\’ve always been a far greater fan of the Marvel Universe rather than DC, and I\’ve never exactly been a huge fan of Batman in the comics (although I do enjoy the films). But I got a nice kick recognizing background characters from Batman: Year One and the various other comic book stories and films, such as Mafia Don Carmine Falcone, Renee Montoya and a few others.

The stand-out roles for me in this first episode were Ben McKenzie, as the rookie Detective James Gordon, and Donal Logue as his senior partner, Detective Harvey Bullock. Logue, in particular, really shines as the world-weary, cynical and corrupt, bordering on amoral older detective. Sean Pertwee also promises to be a real gas as Bruce Wayne\’s butler, Alfred Pennyworth, and Jada Pinkett Smith excels as the sadistic, vicious and near-psychotic Fish Mooney, Falcone\’s treacherous subordinate, who plans to make a move on him.

But, to my surprise, another one of my favourite characters in the episode was Robin Lord Taylor as Oswald \”Penguin\” Cobblepot. He\’s a real psycho, and I look forward to watching him develop, and maybe even get around to exacting his revenge on Mooney and the others who turned on him. I find my liking for this particular character quite ironic, as I could never stand the Penguin as a character in either the comics or the films.

Anyway, roll on 9pm tonight, and the second episode, \”Selina Kyle\”. I hope it\’s as good as the pilot episode.

Comic Books In The Movies – The Purist Conundrum

I\’m a life-long geek, and, like most other hardcore geeks, I\’m a huge fan not only of comics, but of films based on comics. I really enjoy most modern superhero films, and I\’m obviously also a huge fan of many of the original comics that these films are based on, particularly those based on characters created by Marvel Comics.

However, this love of superheroes in both the comics medium and the cinema poses a major problem for some of those more \”die hard\” fans watching films based on their favourite comics. Hardcore comics fans tend to be extreme purists, who can\’t abide even the slightest changes to their favourite comics and characters. These people are almost impossible to please when it comes to any kind of movie adaption of their favourite comic books.

I myself used to be like that, totally obsessed with films being \”exact reproductions\” of my favourite comics or books, but I\’ve wised up over the years and long ago given up any hope of ever seeing any direct translations from comic books to screen. Nowadays all I hope for is to get a decent, fun film.

I still have a few purist tendencies of my own, especially when it comes to my favourite comics. Hell, I\’m almost guaranteed to moan incessantly about any reboot of one of my old classic comics favourites (the Legion of Super-Heroes being a perfect example), let alone a loosely-based movie version. But, in general, these days I\’ve chilled greatly and now I do tend to be a bit more compromising than many of my more \”fanatical\” brothers and sisters.

I\’m also very lucky in that I have a really strong ability to compartmentalize, which means that I can still sit and enjoy a film, even if I spend most of the time criticizing the changes and omissions compared to the comic. If the film is a good FILM in itself, even if it\’s NOT a good adaption of the original comic, I\’ll probably still like it. Sure, I\’ll nitpick about all the continuity errors and differences, the little (and large) inconsistencies and the seemingly gratuitous and unnecessary changes made to the characters, continuity and story (hell, let\’s be honest, all geeks love to nitpick and complain). But if the film is a fun FILM, I\’ll still give it a thumbs-up.

Unfortunately, most of the hardcore purists are much harder to please. They want nothing but a direct translation of their favourite comics to the big screen, and no changes, however small, to the characters, story, continuity and history of the comic concerned are permitted. Well, listen guys, if that\’s what you expect from Hollywood, then you\’re living in cloud cuckoo land. IT AIN\’T EVER GONNA HAPPEN! Hollywood has always done things their own way, and they use comics and books as a vague basis for their films, rather than doing inch-by-inch faithful adaptions (only the \”classics\” get the premium \”don\’t mess with the story\” treatment, and I\’m not referring to classic comics here either).

Add to this the fact that these films are NOT aimed at hardcore comic book geeks at all, but at a completely different, more general cinema audience, and the reality is that you have to accept that superhero films will be completely different beasts to the original comics, with characters and plot ideas cherry-picked from all over the place, rather than from one story.

There are also a few other practicalities which make faithful adaptions a definite no-no. Comics and film are completely different mediums, and direct translations are often simply not possible. What might look or sound great in a comic might definitely NOT look or sound so good in a live action film. A perfect example of something that doesn\’t work at all in movies is comic book characterization and dialogue. It simply does NOT translate well to film. People just do NOT talk and behave in \”real life\” like they do in superhero comics, and anything like that appearing on film either has to be a crazy pastiche, or a comedy, otherwise it just won\’t work at all.

An even more perfect, and more visual example of this failure to translate across media is superhero costumes – the guys and gals wearing their underclothes on the outside. They look great in comics and animation, but my own strongly held opinion (and I\’m far from being on my own here) is that they almost always look ABSOLUTELY pathetic, stupid and laughable in live action movies. With the exception of a handful of \”iconic\” characters (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Spider-Man and a few others) who should NOT have their costumes messed with under any circumstances (do ya hear that Man of Steel? Damned flyin\’ condom…), it\’s almost always better to get rid of the silly \”men in tights\” costumes in movies if you want to be taken seriously. The X-Men films are a perfect example of how to do it right – those padded leather uniforms looked really slick and functional, and were much, much better onscreen than the original costumes. Wolverine definitely looked a heckuva lot better than he would have if he\’d appeared in the silly yellow or brown costume that he wears in the comics.

But let\’s face it, none of the above comments will sway purists at all. No matter what anybody says or does, the purists will never be happy. There\’s always gonna be someone who has to moan, and there\’s absolutely no pleasing these people. Look, all I have to add (aside from \”Chill, and get a life!\”) is this: if you\’re a die-hard purist, and you absolutely CANNOT abide these movies because they dare to alter some of your sacred comic book texts, then ignore them. Don\’t watch them at all. Go down the pub instead and relax with a nice, cool brewski.

Why put yourselves through all the soaring blood pressure, hair pulling, the swearing and frustration? Why do you continue to go to these films if you know you\’ll hate them so much? Do you enjoy torturing yourselves or what? Or is it that you\’re a bunch of drama queens and just LIKE to complain and kick up a fuss so you can get some attention? Y\’know what? Either judge the film as a FILM, not a comic book, because it ISN\’T a damned comic book, it\’s a M-O-V-I-E, or quit yer endless griping and don\’t bother watching the darned thing in the first place.

Or why don\’t you do something really smart and just go away and read some comic books instead? If you want the Real Thing, then read the real thing. Ignore the films altogether and go out and buy all those lovely trade paperbacks and hardback Marvel Masterworks or DC Archives, and other collections of classic Silver and Bronze Age Marvel and DC comics, and drift off into comic book nirvana. The originals will ALWAYS be out there if you want them.

Whether they were good adaptions of the comics, or not, recent years have given us a raft of truly classic superhero films, including the most recent Avengers film, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, X-Men: First Class, The Dark Knight, and Watchmen, among others. There have also been some truly excellent films based on non-superhero comics – the first Hellboy film and the absolutely brilliant Dredd, for example – both of them not only two darned good films, but two of the very best comic book-based films EVER.

If Hollywood keeps dishing out quality comic book films like this, I\’ll be more than happy, as will most fans. And sod the purists. 🙂